Deepgram and the Rise of Voice AI Infrastructure

Voice AI is moving quickly from novelty to infrastructure.

For years, speech technology largely lived at the edge of the enterprise stack: call transcription, dictation, basic IVR, and narrow automation. That is changing. The latest data suggests enterprises are no longer treating voice as a feature. They are beginning to treat it as a core interface — and, increasingly, as a strategic layer of software. Deepgram’s 2025 State of Voice AI report, conducted with Opus Research, found that 97% of surveyed organizations already use some form of voice technology, 67% now view it as foundational to product and business strategy, and 84% plan to increase voice technology budgets over the next year.

That shift matters. It suggests the market is moving beyond experimentation and toward deployment at scale. And when that happens, infrastructure tends to matter more than demos.

Why voice is becoming an important AI battleground

The rise of generative AI made natural language interfaces far more useful. The next step is obvious: if typing into a model feels powerful, speaking to one in real time can feel even more natural. Voice is fast, intuitive, and often the most practical interface in customer support, healthcare intake, field operations, restaurants, logistics, and other real-world workflows. OpenAI’s Realtime API launch underscored this direction by explicitly enabling low-latency, speech-to-speech experiences for developers building conversational applications.

But building enterprise-grade voice systems is harder than it looks. The challenge is not simply generating speech or transcribing audio. It is delivering accuracy, responsiveness, context retention, low latency, and cost efficiency at production scale. That is especially true in settings where users expect a voice agent to sound natural, interrupt gracefully, understand nuance, and complete useful tasks without breaking the flow of conversation. Deepgram’s survey reflects that reality: 72% of respondents cited performance quality as the biggest barrier to deploying voice AI agents, while 65% said compatibility with existing AI systems is a key factor in vendor selection.

In other words, the bottleneck is no longer awareness. It is execution.

What Deepgram appears to be building

Deepgram is positioning itself as infrastructure for this shift. Rather than offering a narrow point solution, the company is building an API platform around speech recognition, speech generation, voice agents, and orchestration for real-time voice applications. In January 2026, the company announced a $130 million Series C at a $1.3 billion valuation, stating that more than 1,300 organizations are already building voice functionality on its APIs. The round included strategic investors such as Twilio, ServiceNow Ventures, SAP, and Citi Ventures, which is notable because it suggests ecosystem relevance, not just financial sponsorship.

That positioning is interesting because Voice AI may become a classic infrastructure market. If enterprises increasingly want voice embedded across products and workflows, they will likely prefer flexible APIs and developer tools over rigid, one-size-fits-all applications. The survey data reinforces this: 46% of respondents said the ability to fine-tune speech models would drive greater adoption, and the report repeatedly points to customization and system compatibility as decisive factors in vendor choice.

This feels directionally similar to what has happened in other categories of enterprise infrastructure. Once a workflow becomes strategic, companies usually want platforms they can adapt to their own data, terminology, compliance needs, and user experience standards. Voice is beginning to look like it may follow the same pattern.

Why the opportunity may be larger than “call center AI”

One of the most important takeaways from the report is that customer service is not the whole story, even if it is the easiest place to see adoption first. Opus Research highlighted that 52% of organizations see customer service automation as voice AI’s most transformative use case. That makes sense: support environments are high-volume, repetitive, expensive, and already voice-native.

But the broader opportunity is likely bigger. Voice can sit across the full customer journey: sales, onboarding, scheduling, support, order management, compliance, analytics, and accessibility. Deepgram’s report notes that 70% of respondents expect benefits from integrating voice technology across multiple customer touchpoints, not just in isolated workflows. It also highlights compliance, security, and accessibility as meaningful adoption drivers.

That matters because large infrastructure outcomes usually emerge when a technology expands from a single departmental tool into a cross-functional layer. Voice may be approaching that transition now.

The gap between adoption and satisfaction

What makes the category especially compelling is that adoption is already high, but satisfaction remains low. Deepgram’s survey found that 80% of organizations use some form of voice agent system, yet only 21% say they are very satisfied with current technology. Meanwhile, 15% are already actively developing next-generation voice AI agents, and 98% of those expect to have them in production within 12 months.

That gap is often where category leaders emerge.

When customers clearly want something, budgets are rising, and existing solutions are still falling short, the market is usually in an important transition period. Legacy IVR systems and earlier voice tools solved narrow problems, but they did not deliver truly conversational, context-aware, human-like interactions. The companies that can close that performance gap — while keeping latency low and economics manageable — may end up owning a valuable layer of the AI stack.

Why Deepgram stands out

Deepgram’s appeal seems to rest on three things.

First, it is aligned with where the market is going: from transcription and voice features toward real-time, full-stack voice experiences. Second, it appears to be building for developers and enterprises rather than just packaging a thin demo around foundation models. Third, its recent financing and strategic investor base suggest that sophisticated partners see it as important infrastructure for the next wave of voice applications.

None of that guarantees a winner. Voice AI will be competitive, and the market is evolving quickly. Large model providers, communications platforms, and specialized startups are all moving aggressively. But if Voice AI becomes a durable enterprise software layer, companies that solve the hard infrastructure problems — accuracy, latency, orchestration, customization, and cost at scale — should have a real chance to matter.

That is what makes Deepgram worth watching. This is not just a story about better transcription or a smarter phone tree. It is a story about voice becoming a serious interface for modern software — and about the infrastructure companies trying to power that shift.

If the next major wave of AI is not only typed but spoken, Deepgram may be building in the right place.

Why this matters to us

For PrePublic Equity Partners, Deepgram fits a broader theme we find compelling: backing or tracking infrastructure businesses that enable the next wave of AI adoption. While much of the market’s attention remains focused on consumer-facing applications, we believe important long-term value may also be created by the foundational platforms that help enterprises deploy AI in real-world settings. If voice becomes a core interface layer across industries, the companies providing the underlying tools, APIs, and performance needed to support that shift could occupy an important position in the stack.

Care to get more insights and access to our research? Fill out the form below.

RESEARCH DISCLOSURE This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It represents independent thematic analysis prepared by PrePublic Equity Partners ("PEP") and is intended to discuss industry trends and company dynamics in the private markets. This content does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or investment product. PEP is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Any offer or solicitation relating to securities will be made only through definitive offering documents to eligible investors. PEP and its affiliates may hold financial interests in companies discussed herein and reserve the right to trade such positions at any time without notice. Private market investing involves significant risk, including illiquidity and potential loss of principal. All data is sourced from publicly available information and has not been independently verified.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE This content is published by PrePublic Equity Partners ("PEP") for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. No such offer or solicitation is made except by means of a confidential Private Placement Memorandum or other definitive offering documents delivered to eligible investors only. PEP is not a registered investment adviser with the SEC or any state securities regulator. Nothing in this article should be construed as personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. All views are the opinions of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Private market and pre-IPO investing involves a high degree of risk, including illiquidity, potential total loss of principal, and reliance on unverified private company data. Past analytical observations are not indicative of future results. PEP and its affiliates, officers, or employees may hold financial interests in companies discussed in this article. PEP reserves the right to buy or sell such positions at any time without notice. PEP does not receive compensation from issuers mentioned in its research. PEP is an independently operated subsidiary of Alumni Ventures, LLC.